diff options
| author | Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> | 2026-09-04 17:06:00 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 18:17:30 -0700 |
| commit | 1d7f8f191c06f967a85922c4652dc33c132b585d (patch) | |
| tree | f49797769778469a0070426cac00e815caddcdb2 | |
| parent | 91957791663f49561848c40e982061799b8f86b0 (diff) | |
| download | linux-next-1d7f8f191c06f967a85922c4652dc33c132b585d.tar.gz linux-next-1d7f8f191c06f967a85922c4652dc33c132b585d.zip | |
bpf: propagate mark_chain_precision() errors out of loop_flag_is_zero()
Stop verification if mark_chain_precision() fails when called from
loop_flag_is_zero(). No functional change intended for the paths where
backtracking succeeds.
Fixes: 1ade23711971 ("bpf: Inline calls to bpf_loop when callback is known")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904-register-is-null-precise-fixes-v1-9-0f5a360ff15d@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 1b9fcbe4621a..e8af1d3dbdeb 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -10702,33 +10702,45 @@ static struct bpf_insn_aux_data *cur_aux(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return &env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx]; } -static bool loop_flag_is_zero(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +/* Returns 1 if R4 is a known zero, 0 if it is not, a negative errno on error. */ +static int loop_flag_is_zero(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { struct bpf_reg_state *reg = reg_state(env, BPF_REG_4); - bool reg_is_null = bpf_register_is_null(reg); + int err; - if (reg_is_null) - mark_chain_precision(env, BPF_REG_4); + if (!bpf_register_is_null(reg)) + return 0; - return reg_is_null; + err = mark_chain_precision(env, BPF_REG_4); + if (err) + return err; + return 1; } -static void update_loop_inline_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 subprogno) +static int update_loop_inline_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 subprogno) { struct bpf_loop_inline_state *state = &cur_aux(env)->loop_inline_state; + int flag_is_zero; if (!state->initialized) { + flag_is_zero = loop_flag_is_zero(env); + if (flag_is_zero < 0) + return flag_is_zero; state->initialized = 1; - state->fit_for_inline = loop_flag_is_zero(env); + state->fit_for_inline = flag_is_zero; state->callback_subprogno = subprogno; - return; + return 0; } if (!state->fit_for_inline) - return; + return 0; - state->fit_for_inline = (loop_flag_is_zero(env) && + flag_is_zero = loop_flag_is_zero(env); + if (flag_is_zero < 0) + return flag_is_zero; + state->fit_for_inline = (flag_is_zero && state->callback_subprogno == subprogno); + return 0; } /* Returns whether or not the given map can potentially elide @@ -10960,7 +10972,9 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn err = check_bpf_snprintf_call(env, regs); break; case BPF_FUNC_loop: - update_loop_inline_state(env, meta.subprogno); + err = update_loop_inline_state(env, meta.subprogno); + if (err) + return err; /* Verifier relies on R1 value to determine if bpf_loop() iteration * is finished, thus mark it precise. */ |
