kernel/git/stable/linux.git/fs/f2fs, branch linux-4.4.y

f2fs: fix out-of-repair __setattr_copy()

2021-03-03T15:44:23+00:00

commit 2562515f0ad7342bde6456602c491b64c63fe950 upstream. __setattr_copy() was copied from setattr_copy() in fs/attr.c, there is two missing patches doesn't cover this inner function, fix it. Commit 7fa294c8991c ("userns: Allow chown and setgid preservation") Commit 23adbe12ef7d ("fs,userns: Change inode_capable to capable_wrt_inode_uidgid") Fixes: fbfa2cc58d53 ("f2fs: add file operations") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

f2fs: fix to check segment boundary during SIT page readahead

2020-11-10T09:22:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6a257471fa42c8c9c04a875cd3a2a22db148e0f0 ] As syzbot reported: kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.h:657! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 16220 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:f2fs_ra_meta_pages+0xa51/0xdc0 fs/f2fs/segment.h:657 Call Trace: build_sit_entries fs/f2fs/segment.c:4195 [inline] f2fs_build_segment_manager+0x4b8a/0xa3c0 fs/f2fs/segment.c:4779 f2fs_fill_super+0x377d/0x6b80 fs/f2fs/super.c:3633 mount_bdev+0x32e/0x3f0 fs/super.c:1417 legacy_get_tree+0x105/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:592 vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1547 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2875 [inline] path_mount+0x1387/0x2070 fs/namespace.c:3192 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3205 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3413 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3390 [inline] __x64_sys_mount+0x27f/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3390 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 @blkno in f2fs_ra_meta_pages could exceed max segment count, causing panic in following sanity check in current_sit_addr(), add check condition to avoid this issue. Reported-by: syzbot+3698081bcf0bb2d12174@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

f2fs crypto: avoid unneeded memory allocation in ->readdir

2020-11-10T09:22:12+00:00

commit e06f86e61d7a67fe6e826010f57aa39c674f4b1b upstream. When decrypting dirents in ->readdir, fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr won't change content of original encrypted dirent, we don't need to allocate additional buffer for storing mirror of it, so get rid of it. [This backport fixes a regression in 4.4-stable caused by commit 11a6e8f89521 ("f2fs: check memory boundary by insane namelen"), which depended on this missing commit. This bad backport broke f2fs encryption because it moved the incrementing of 'bit_pos' to earlier in f2fs_fill_dentries() without accounting for it being used in the encrypted dir case. This caused readdir() on encrypted directories to start failing. Tested with 'kvm-xfstests -c f2fs -g encrypt'.] Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fscrypt: return -EXDEV for incompatible rename or link into encrypted dir

2020-11-10T09:22:12+00:00

commit f5e55e777cc93eae1416f0fa4908e8846b6d7825 upstream. Currently, trying to rename or link a regular file, directory, or symlink into an encrypted directory fails with EPERM when the source file is unencrypted or is encrypted with a different encryption policy, and is on the same mountpoint. It is correct for the operation to fail, but the choice of EPERM breaks tools like 'mv' that know to copy rather than rename if they see EXDEV, but don't know what to do with EPERM. Our original motivation for EPERM was to encourage users to securely handle their data. Encrypting files by "moving" them into an encrypted directory can be insecure because the unencrypted data may remain in free space on disk, where it can later be recovered by an attacker. It's much better to encrypt the data from the start, or at least try to securely delete the source data e.g. using the 'shred' program. However, the current behavior hasn't been effective at achieving its goal because users tend to be confused, hack around it, and complain; see e.g. https://github.com/google/fscrypt/issues/76. And in some cases it's actually inconsistent or unnecessary. For example, 'mv'-ing files between differently encrypted directories doesn't work even in cases where it can be secure, such as when in userspace the same passphrase protects both directories. Yet, you *can* already 'mv' unencrypted files into an encrypted directory if the source files are on a different mountpoint, even though doing so is often insecure. There are probably better ways to teach users to securely handle their files. For example, the 'fscrypt' userspace tool could provide a command that migrates unencrypted files into an encrypted directory, acting like 'shred' on the source files and providing appropriate warnings depending on the type of the source filesystem and disk. Receiving errors on unimportant files might also force some users to disable encryption, thus making the behavior counterproductive. It's desirable to make encryption as unobtrusive as possible. Therefore, change the error code from EPERM to EXDEV so that tools looking for EXDEV will fall back to a copy. This, of course, doesn't prevent users from still doing the right things to securely manage their files. Note that this also matches the behavior when a file is renamed between two project quota hierarchies; so there's precedent for using EXDEV for things other than mountpoints. xfstests generic/398 will require an update with this change. [Rewritten from an earlier patch series by Michael Halcrow.] Cc: Michael Halcrow Cc: Joe Richey Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

f2fs: check if file namelen exceeds max value

2020-08-21T08:52:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 720db068634c91553a8e1d9a0fcd8c7050e06d2b ] Dentry bitmap is not enough to detect incorrect dentries. So this patch also checks the namelen value of a dentry. Signed-off-by: Gong Chen Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

f2fs: check memory boundary by insane namelen

2020-08-21T08:52:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4e240d1bab1ead280ddf5eb05058dba6bbd57d10 ] If namelen is corrupted to have very long value, fill_dentries can copy wrong memory area. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

f2fs: return correct errno in f2fs_gc

2019-11-25T14:54:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 61f7725aa148ee870436a29d3a24d5c00ab7e9af ] This fixes overriding error number in f2fs_gc. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

f2fs: fix to do sanity check on segment bitmap of LFS curseg

2019-10-05T10:27:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit c854f4d681365498f53ba07843a16423625aa7e9 ] As Jungyeon Reported in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203233 - Reproduces gcc poc_13.c ./run.sh f2fs - Kernel messages F2FS-fs (sdb): Bitmap was wrongly set, blk:4608 kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2133! RIP: 0010:update_sit_entry+0x35d/0x3e0 Call Trace: f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x16c/0x5a0 do_write_page+0x57/0x100 f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x33/0xa0 __write_node_page+0x270/0x4e0 f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x5df/0x670 f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x364/0x13a0 f2fs_sync_fs+0xa3/0x130 f2fs_do_sync_file+0x1a6/0x810 do_fsync+0x33/0x60 __x64_sys_fsync+0xb/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The testcase fails because that, in fuzzed image, current segment was allocated with LFS type, its .next_blkoff should point to an unused block address, but actually, its bitmap shows it's not. So during allocation, f2fs crash when setting bitmap. Introducing sanity_check_curseg() to check such inconsistence of current in-used segment. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Revert "f2fs: avoid out-of-range memory access"

2019-10-05T10:27:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit a37d0862d17411edb67677a580a6f505ec2225f6 ] As Pavel Machek reported: "We normally use -EUCLEAN to signal filesystem corruption. Plus, it is good idea to report it to the syslog and mark filesystem as "needing fsck" if filesystem can do that." Still we need improve the original patch with: - use unlikely keyword - add message print - return EUCLEAN However, after rethink this patch, I don't think we should add such condition check here as below reasons: - We have already checked the field in f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(), - If there is fs corrupt or security vulnerability, there is nothing to guarantee the field is integrated after the check, unless we do the check before each of its use, however no filesystem does that. - We only have similar check for bitmap, which was added due to there is bitmap corruption happened on f2fs' runtime in product. - There are so many key fields in SB/CP/NAT did have such check after f2fs_sanity_check_{sb,cp,..}. So I propose to revert this unneeded check. This reverts commit 56f3ce675103e3fb9e631cfb4131fc768bc23e9a. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

f2fs: check all the data segments against all node ones

2019-10-05T10:27:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1166c1f2f69117ad254189ca781287afa6e550b6 ] As a part of the sanity checking while mounting, distinct segment number assignment to data and node segments is verified. Fixing a small bug in this verification between node and data segments. We need to check all the data segments with all the node segments. Fixes: 042be0f849e5f ("f2fs: fix to do sanity check with current segment number") Signed-off-by: Surbhi Palande Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin