kernel/git/stable/linux.git/mm/page-writeback.c, branch linux-4.19.y

mm: avoid overflows in dirty throttling logic

2024-08-19T03:32:07+00:00

[ Upstream commit 385d838df280eba6c8680f9777bfa0d0bfe7e8b2 ] The dirty throttling logic is interspersed with assumptions that dirty limits in PAGE_SIZE units fit into 32-bit (so that various multiplications fit into 64-bits). If limits end up being larger, we will hit overflows, possible divisions by 0 etc. Fix these problems by never allowing so large dirty limits as they have dubious practical value anyway. For dirty_bytes / dirty_background_bytes interfaces we can just refuse to set so large limits. For dirty_ratio / dirty_background_ratio it isn't so simple as the dirty limit is computed from the amount of available memory which can change due to memory hotplug etc. So when converting dirty limits from ratios to numbers of pages, we just don't allow the result to exceed UINT_MAX. This is root-only triggerable problem which occurs when the operator sets dirty limits to >16 TB. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621144246.11148-2-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reported-by: Zach O'Keefe Reviewed-By: Zach O'Keefe Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Revert "mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again"

2024-07-18T09:39:35+00:00

commit 30139c702048f1097342a31302cbd3d478f50c63 upstream. Patch series "mm: Avoid possible overflows in dirty throttling". Dirty throttling logic assumes dirty limits in page units fit into 32-bits. This patch series makes sure this is true (see patch 2/2 for more details). This patch (of 2): This reverts commit 9319b647902cbd5cc884ac08a8a6d54ce111fc78. The commit is broken in several ways. Firstly, the removed (u64) cast from the multiplication will introduce a multiplication overflow on 32-bit archs if wb_thresh * bg_thresh >= 1<<32 (which is actually common - the default settings with 4GB of RAM will trigger this). Secondly, the div64_u64() is unnecessarily expensive on 32-bit archs. We have div64_ul() in case we want to be safe & cheap. Thirdly, if dirty thresholds are larger than 1<<32 pages, then dirty balancing is going to blow up in many other spectacular ways anyway so trying to fix one possible overflow is just moot. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621144017.30993-1-jack@suse.cz Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240621144246.11148-1-jack@suse.cz Fixes: 9319b647902c ("mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-By: Zach O'Keefe Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again

2024-02-23T07:12:56+00:00

commit 9319b647902cbd5cc884ac08a8a6d54ce111fc78 upstream. (struct dirty_throttle_control *)->thresh is an unsigned long, but is passed as the u32 divisor argument to div_u64(). On architectures where unsigned long is 64 bytes, the argument will be implicitly truncated. Use div64_u64() instead of div_u64() so that the value used in the "is this a safe division" check is the same as the divisor. Also, remove redundant cast of the numerator to u64, as that should happen implicitly. This would be difficult to exploit in memcg domain, given the ratio-based arithmetic domain_drity_limits() uses, but is much easier in global writeback domain with a BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT-backing device, using e.g. vm.dirty_bytes=(1<<32)*PAGE_SIZE so that dtc->thresh == (1<<32) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240118181954.1415197-1-zokeefe@google.com Fixes: f6789593d5ce ("mm/page-writeback.c: fix divide by zero in bdi_dirty_limits()") Signed-off-by: Zach O'Keefe Cc: Maxim Patlasov Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/page-writeback.c: avoid potential division by zero in wb_min_max_ratio()

2020-01-23T07:21:31+00:00

commit 6d9e8c651dd979aa666bee15f086745f3ea9c4b3 upstream. Patch series "use div64_ul() instead of div_u64() if the divisor is unsigned long". We were first inspired by commit b0ab99e7736a ("sched: Fix possible divide by zero in avg_atom () calculation"), then refer to the recently analyzed mm code, we found this suspicious place. 201 if (min) { 202 min *= this_bw; 203 do_div(min, tot_bw); 204 } And we also disassembled and confirmed it: /usr/src/debug/kernel-4.9.168-016.ali3000/linux-4.9.168-016.ali3000.alios7.x86_64/mm/page-writeback.c: 201 0xffffffff811c37da <__wb_calc_thresh+234>: xor %r10d,%r10d 0xffffffff811c37dd <__wb_calc_thresh+237>: test %rax,%rax 0xffffffff811c37e0 <__wb_calc_thresh+240>: je 0xffffffff811c3800 <__wb_calc_thresh+272> /usr/src/debug/kernel-4.9.168-016.ali3000/linux-4.9.168-016.ali3000.alios7.x86_64/mm/page-writeback.c: 202 0xffffffff811c37e2 <__wb_calc_thresh+242>: imul %r8,%rax /usr/src/debug/kernel-4.9.168-016.ali3000/linux-4.9.168-016.ali3000.alios7.x86_64/mm/page-writeback.c: 203 0xffffffff811c37e6 <__wb_calc_thresh+246>: mov %r9d,%r10d ---> truncates it to 32 bits here 0xffffffff811c37e9 <__wb_calc_thresh+249>: xor %edx,%edx 0xffffffff811c37eb <__wb_calc_thresh+251>: div %r10 0xffffffff811c37ee <__wb_calc_thresh+254>: imul %rbx,%rax 0xffffffff811c37f2 <__wb_calc_thresh+258>: shr $0x2,%rax 0xffffffff811c37f6 <__wb_calc_thresh+262>: mul %rcx 0xffffffff811c37f9 <__wb_calc_thresh+265>: shr $0x2,%rdx 0xffffffff811c37fd <__wb_calc_thresh+269>: mov %rdx,%r10 This series uses div64_ul() instead of div_u64() if the divisor is unsigned long, to avoid truncation to 32-bit on 64-bit platforms. This patch (of 3): The variables 'min' and 'max' are unsigned long and do_div truncates them to 32 bits, which means it can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division. Fix this issue by using div64_ul() instead. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200102081442.8273-2-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com Fixes: 693108a8a667 ("writeback: make bdi->min/max_ratio handling cgroup writeback aware") Signed-off-by: Wen Yang Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/page-writeback.c: fix range_cyclic writeback vs writepages deadlock

2019-12-01T08:17:02+00:00

[ Upstream commit 64081362e8ff4587b4554087f3cfc73d3e0a4cd7 ] We've recently seen a workload on XFS filesystems with a repeatable deadlock between background writeback and a multi-process application doing concurrent writes and fsyncs to a small range of a file. range_cyclic writeback Process 1 Process 2 xfs_vm_writepages write_cache_pages writeback_index = 2 cycled = 0 .... find page 2 dirty lock Page 2 ->writepage page 2 writeback page 2 clean page 2 added to bio no more pages write() locks page 1 dirties page 1 locks page 2 dirties page 1 fsync() .... xfs_vm_writepages write_cache_pages start index 0 find page 1 towrite lock Page 1 ->writepage page 1 writeback page 1 clean page 1 added to bio find page 2 towrite lock Page 2 page 2 is writeback write() locks page 1 dirties page 1 fsync() .... xfs_vm_writepages write_cache_pages start index 0 !done && !cycled sets index to 0, restarts lookup find page 1 dirty find page 1 towrite lock Page 1 page 1 is writeback lock Page 1 DEADLOCK because: - process 1 needs page 2 writeback to complete to make enough progress to issue IO pending for page 1 - writeback needs page 1 writeback to complete so process 2 can progress and unlock the page it is blocked on, then it can issue the IO pending for page 2 - process 2 can't make progress until process 1 issues IO for page 1 The underlying cause of the problem here is that range_cyclic writeback is processing pages in descending index order as we hold higher index pages in a structure controlled from above write_cache_pages(). The write_cache_pages() caller needs to be able to submit these pages for IO before write_cache_pages restarts writeback at mapping index 0 to avoid wcp inverting the page lock/writeback wait order. generic_writepages() is not susceptible to this bug as it has no private context held across write_cache_pages() - filesystems using this infrastructure always submit pages in ->writepage immediately and so there is no problem with range_cyclic going back to mapping index 0. However: mpage_writepages() has a private bio context, exofs_writepages() has page_collect fuse_writepages() has fuse_fill_wb_data nfs_writepages() has nfs_pageio_descriptor xfs_vm_writepages() has xfs_writepage_ctx All of these ->writepages implementations can hold pages under writeback in their private structures until write_cache_pages() returns, and hence they are all susceptible to this deadlock. Also worth noting is that ext4 has it's own bastardised version of write_cache_pages() and so it /may/ have an equivalent deadlock. I looked at the code long enough to understand that it has a similar retry loop for range_cyclic writeback reaching the end of the file and then promptly ran away before my eyes bled too much. I'll leave it for the ext4 developers to determine if their code is actually has this deadlock and how to fix it if it has. There's a few ways I can see avoid this deadlock. There's probably more, but these are the first I've though of: 1. get rid of range_cyclic altogether 2. range_cyclic always stops at EOF, and we start again from writeback index 0 on the next call into write_cache_pages() 2a. wcp also returns EAGAIN to ->writepages implementations to indicate range cyclic has hit EOF. writepages implementations can then flush the current context and call wpc again to continue. i.e. lift the retry into the ->writepages implementation 3. range_cyclic uses trylock_page() rather than lock_page(), and it skips pages it can't lock without blocking. It will already do this for pages under writeback, so this seems like a no-brainer 3a. all non-WB_SYNC_ALL writeback uses trylock_page() to avoid blocking as per pages under writeback. I don't think #1 is an option - range_cyclic prevents frequently dirtied lower file offset from starving background writeback of rarely touched higher file offsets. #2 is simple, and I don't think it will have any impact on performance as going back to the start of the file implies an immediate seek. We'll have exactly the same number of seeks if we switch writeback to another inode, and then come back to this one later and restart from index 0. #2a is pretty much "status quo without the deadlock". Moving the retry loop up into the wcp caller means we can issue IO on the pending pages before calling wcp again, and so avoid locking or waiting on pages in the wrong order. I'm not convinced we need to do this given that we get the same thing from #2 on the next writeback call from the writeback infrastructure. #3 is really just a band-aid - it doesn't fix the access/wait inversion problem, just prevents it from becoming a deadlock situation. I'd prefer we fix the inversion, not sweep it under the carpet like this. #3a is really an optimisation that just so happens to include the band-aid fix of #3. So it seems that the simplest way to fix this issue is to implement solution #2 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181005054526.21507-1-david@fromorbit.com Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Cc: Nicholas Piggin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm/page-writeback.c: don't break integrity writeback on ->writepage() error

2019-01-26T08:32:43+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3fa750dcf29e8606e3969d13d8e188cc1c0f511d ] write_cache_pages() is used in both background and integrity writeback scenarios by various filesystems. Background writeback is mostly concerned with cleaning a certain number of dirty pages based on various mm heuristics. It may not write the full set of dirty pages or wait for I/O to complete. Integrity writeback is responsible for persisting a set of dirty pages before the writeback job completes. For example, an fsync() call must perform integrity writeback to ensure data is on disk before the call returns. write_cache_pages() unconditionally breaks out of its processing loop in the event of a ->writepage() error. This is fine for background writeback, which had no strict requirements and will eventually come around again. This can cause problems for integrity writeback on filesystems that might need to clean up state associated with failed page writeouts. For example, XFS performs internal delayed allocation accounting before returning a ->writepage() error, where applicable. If the current writeback happens to be associated with an unmount and write_cache_pages() completes the writeback prematurely due to error, the filesystem is unmounted in an inconsistent state if dirty+delalloc pages still exist. To handle this problem, update write_cache_pages() to always process the full set of pages for integrity writeback regardless of ->writepage() errors. Save the first encountered error and return it to the caller once complete. This facilitates XFS (or any other fs that expects integrity writeback to process the entire set of dirty pages) to clean up its internal state completely in the event of persistent mapping errors. Background writeback continues to exit on the first error encountered. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo in comment] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181116134304.32440-1-bfoster@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Brian Foster Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

notifier: Remove notifier header file wherever not used

2018-08-30T10:56:40+00:00

The conversion of the hotplug notifiers to a state machine left the notifier.h includes around in some places. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1535114033-4605-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org

mm/page-writeback.c: update stale account_page_redirty() comment

2018-08-17T23:20:30+00:00

Commit 93f78d882865 ("writeback: move backing_dev_info->bdi_stat[] into bdi_writeback") replaced BDI_DIRTIED with WB_DIRTIED in account_page_redirty(). Update comment to track that change. BDI_DIRTIED => WB_DIRTIED BDI_WRITTEN => WB_WRITTEN Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180625171526.173483-1-gthelen@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Acked-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

writeback: safer lock nesting

2018-04-21T00:18:35+00:00

lock_page_memcg()/unlock_page_memcg() use spin_lock_irqsave/restore() if the page's memcg is undergoing move accounting, which occurs when a process leaves its memcg for a new one that has memory.move_charge_at_immigrate set. unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin,end() use spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq() if the given inode is switching writeback domains. Switches occur when enough writes are issued from a new domain. This existing pattern is thus suspicious: lock_page_memcg(page); unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &locked); ... unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, locked); unlock_page_memcg(page); If both inode switch and process memcg migration are both in-flight then unlocked_inode_to_wb_end() will unconditionally enable interrupts while still holding the lock_page_memcg() irq spinlock. This suggests the possibility of deadlock if an interrupt occurs before unlock_page_memcg(). truncate __cancel_dirty_page lock_page_memcg unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin unlocked_inode_to_wb_end end_page_writeback test_clear_page_writeback lock_page_memcg unlock_page_memcg Due to configuration limitations this deadlock is not currently possible because we don't mix cgroup writeback (a cgroupv2 feature) and memory.move_charge_at_immigrate (a cgroupv1 feature). If the kernel is hacked to always claim inode switching and memcg moving_account, then this script triggers lockup in less than a minute: cd /mnt/cgroup/memory mkdir a b echo 1 > a/memory.move_charge_at_immigrate echo 1 > b/memory.move_charge_at_immigrate ( echo $BASHPID > a/cgroup.procs while true; do dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/big bs=1M count=256 done ) & while true; do sync done & sleep 1h & SLEEP=$! while true; do echo $SLEEP > a/cgroup.procs echo $SLEEP > b/cgroup.procs done The deadlock does not seem possible, so it's debatable if there's any reason to modify the kernel. I suggest we should to prevent future surprises. And Wang Long said "this deadlock occurs three times in our environment", so there's more reason to apply this, even to stable. Stable 4.4 has minor conflicts applying this patch. For a clean 4.4 patch see "[PATCH for-4.4] writeback: safer lock nesting" https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/11/146 Wang Long said "this deadlock occurs three times in our environment" [gthelen@google.com: v4] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180411084653.254724-1-gthelen@google.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: comment tweaks, struct initialization simplification] Change-Id: Ibb773e8045852978f6207074491d262f1b3fb613 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180410005908.167976-1-gthelen@google.com Fixes: 682aa8e1a6a1 ("writeback: implement unlocked_inode_to_wb transaction and use it for stat updates") Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen Reported-by: Wang Long Acked-by: Wang Long Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Nicholas Piggin Cc: [v4.2+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

page cache: use xa_lock

2018-04-11T17:28:39+00:00

Remove the address_space ->tree_lock and use the xa_lock newly added to the radix_tree_root. Rename the address_space ->page_tree to ->i_pages, since we don't really care that it's a tree. [willy@infradead.org: fix nds32, fs/dax.c] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180406145415.GB20605@bombadil.infradead.orgLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180313132639.17387-9-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox Acked-by: Jeff Layton Cc: Darrick J. Wong Cc: Dave Chinner Cc: Ryusuke Konishi Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds