diff options
| author | Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> | 2026-09-04 10:43:15 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 07:58:35 -0700 |
| commit | 17487b31f479c85eda3685e8e44242358bd68f23 (patch) | |
| tree | 02b9ede8b091b38a37066570fb2e63a84adbb363 /tools | |
| parent | 048029ba1c793f8cabc4ad5eea765da01903f8f1 (diff) | |
| download | linux-17487b31f479c85eda3685e8e44242358bd68f23.tar.gz linux-17487b31f479c85eda3685e8e44242358bd68f23.zip | |
selftests/bpf: Reject non-percpu values in percpu kptr fields
Add verifier coverage for the two ways a non-percpu pointer can be stored
in a __percpu_kptr field: a program-BTF local allocation returned by
bpf_obj_new(), and a referenced kernel-BTF task_struct pointer.
Without the verifier fix, both programs are unexpectedly accepted and the
negative tests fail. Requiring MEM_PERCPU makes both programs fail
verification with the expected invalid-kptr diagnostic.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904084325.52250-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c | 59 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c index 08379c3b6a03..3701f4ea58c7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_fail.c @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ struct { __type(value, struct elem); } array SEC(".maps"); +struct kernel_percpu_elem { + struct task_struct __percpu_kptr *task; +}; + +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 1); + __type(key, int); + __type(value, struct kernel_percpu_elem); +} kernel_percpu_array SEC(".maps"); + +struct task_struct *bpf_task_from_pid(s32 pid) __ksym; +void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym; + long ret; SEC("?fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") @@ -137,6 +151,51 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_array_map_5) return 0; } +SEC("?syscall") +__failure __msg("invalid kptr access, R2 type=trusted_ptr_ expected=ptr_task_struct") +int reject_kernel_ptr_into_percpu_kptr(void *ctx) +{ + struct kernel_percpu_elem *e; + struct task_struct *p, *old; + int index = 0; + + e = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&kernel_percpu_array, &index); + if (!e) + return 0; + + p = bpf_task_from_pid(1); + if (!p) + return 0; + + old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&e->task, p); + if (old) + bpf_task_release(old); + return 0; +} + +SEC("?fentry.s/bpf_fentry_test1") +__failure __msg("invalid kptr access, R2 type=ptr_ expected=ptr_val_t") +int BPF_PROG(reject_plain_alloc_into_percpu_kptr) +{ + struct val_t __percpu_kptr *old; + struct val_t *p; + struct elem *e; + int index = 0; + + e = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&array, &index); + if (!e) + return 0; + + p = bpf_obj_new(struct val_t); + if (!p) + return 0; + + old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&e->pc, p); + if (old) + bpf_percpu_obj_drop(old); + return 0; +} + SEC("?fentry.s/bpf_fentry_test1") __failure __msg("bpf_percpu_obj_new type ID argument must be of a struct of scalars") int BPF_PROG(test_array_map_6) |
