summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>2026-09-04 10:43:19 +0200
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2026-09-04 07:58:36 -0700
commit6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722 (patch)
tree58e8288fead484f6755ad0815fc74c3742663761 /tools
parentcd6f72d7f38e10aa82fcbc745a6a9e58e0d8e366 (diff)
downloadlinux-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.tar.gz
linux-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.zip
selftests/bpf: Reject graph kptr use after RCU unlock
Add a sleepable verifier test that loads a graph-node local kptr in an explicit RCU read-side critical section, then passes its node to bpf_rbtree_remove() after the section ends. Before the verifier fix, the stale NON_OWN_REF flag makes the node look like a live borrowed reference and the program is accepted. After the fix, the pointer is demoted without NON_OWN_REF and the graph kfunc argument is rejected. Also exercise a graph kptr loaded while a spin lock provides implicit RCU protection. The pointer must be invalidated when the lock is released, which guards the required ordering between non-owning-reference invalidation and RCU demotion. Update the existing fault-protected load test state description. The post-unlock pointer no longer carries NON_OWN_REF, but remains readable because the load is rewritten to use BPF_PROBE_MEM. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904084325.52250-7-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rcu_read_lock.c6
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr_fail.c75
2 files changed, 78 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rcu_read_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rcu_read_lock.c
index 31d4081c3a9f..cdb255addbc3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rcu_read_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rcu_read_lock.c
@@ -592,9 +592,9 @@ int non_own_ref_untrusted_ld(void *ctx)
}
bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
/*
- * The unlock leaves node as PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_UNTRUSTED
- * | NON_OWN_REF, and the load below has to get the BPF_PROBE_MEM
- * rewrite for it, otherwise a bad address panics the kernel.
+ * The unlock leaves node as PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_UNTRUSTED,
+ * and the load below has to get the BPF_PROBE_MEM rewrite for it,
+ * otherwise a bad address panics the kernel.
*/
non_own_ref_key = node->key;
return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr_fail.c
index 7d2f8897e5ad..f787ecf189d8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr_fail.c
@@ -28,6 +28,17 @@ struct map_value_refcount_only {
struct node_refcount_only __kptr *node;
};
+struct rcu_graph_node {
+ struct bpf_rb_node node;
+ long data;
+};
+
+struct rcu_graph_node *just_here_because_btf_bug;
+
+struct map_value_rcu_graph {
+ struct rcu_graph_node __kptr *node;
+};
+
extern void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void) __ksym;
extern void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void) __ksym;
@@ -36,6 +47,8 @@ private(A) struct bpf_spin_lock glock;
private(A) struct bpf_rb_root groot __contains(node_acquire, node);
private(B) struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
private(B) struct bpf_list_head head __contains(node_refcounted, list);
+private(C) struct bpf_spin_lock graph_lock;
+private(C) struct bpf_rb_root graph_root __contains(rcu_graph_node, node);
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
@@ -44,6 +57,13 @@ struct {
__uint(max_entries, 1);
} stashed_refcount_only SEC(".maps");
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct map_value_rcu_graph);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+} stashed_rcu_graph SEC(".maps");
+
static bool less(struct bpf_rb_node *a, const struct bpf_rb_node *b)
{
struct node_acquire *node_a;
@@ -137,6 +157,61 @@ long refcount_acquire_rcu_map_kptr_unchecked_drop(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("?syscall")
+__failure
+__msg("bpf_rbtree_remove can only take non-owning or refcounted "
+ "bpf_rb_node pointer")
+long rbtree_remove_after_rcu_unlock(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct map_value_rcu_graph *mapval;
+ struct bpf_rb_node *rb_node;
+ struct rcu_graph_node *node;
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ mapval = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&stashed_rcu_graph, &idx);
+ if (!mapval)
+ return 0;
+
+ bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+ node = mapval->node;
+ if (!node) {
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+ return 0;
+ }
+ bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ bpf_spin_lock(&graph_lock);
+ rb_node = bpf_rbtree_remove(&graph_root, &node->node);
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&graph_lock);
+ if (rb_node)
+ bpf_obj_drop(container_of(rb_node, struct rcu_graph_node, node));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?syscall")
+__failure __msg("invalid mem access 'scalar'")
+long graph_kptr_after_spin_unlock(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct map_value_rcu_graph *mapval;
+ struct rcu_graph_node *node;
+ int idx = 0;
+
+ mapval = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&stashed_rcu_graph, &idx);
+ if (!mapval)
+ return 0;
+
+ bpf_spin_lock(&graph_lock);
+ node = mapval->node;
+ if (!node) {
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&graph_lock);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ bpf_spin_unlock(&graph_lock);
+
+ return node->data;
+}
+
SEC("?tc")
__failure __msg("Unreleased reference id=3 alloc_insn={{[0-9]+}}")
long rbtree_refcounted_node_ref_escapes_owning_input(void *ctx)