diff options
| author | Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> | 2026-09-04 01:33:24 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> | 2026-09-04 12:58:04 +0200 |
| commit | 6aed0134d3cda6382385a734ae0158eb7df6b142 (patch) | |
| tree | e30dca447a0ea122d540d38e6742dabd6250942e | |
| parent | 836b2fe544a5e9b5ce116622cb36fba33838c6fd (diff) | |
| download | linux-6aed0134d3cda6382385a734ae0158eb7df6b142.tar.gz linux-6aed0134d3cda6382385a734ae0158eb7df6b142.zip | |
bpf: Mark the zero register precise for a register-form NULL check
check_cond_jmp_op() accepts "if rA <op> rB" as a NULL check for a
nullable pointer rA when rB is a scalar known to be zero,
lifts PTR_MAYBE_NULL from rA in the corresponding branch and does not
mark rB precise. Consider the following program:
r0 = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
r6 = 1; /* the r6 == 0 path is explored first */
if (r0 == 0) goto 1f;
r6 = 0;
1:
r0 = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &0); /* absent, NULL at runtime */
if (r0 == r6) goto 2f; /* taken as a NULL check for r0 */
*(u8 *)(r0 + 0); /* verifier: map value; runtime: zero */
2:
return 0;
The r6 == 0 path is explored first and the dereference is accepted.
The r6 == 1 path is pruned at the checkpoint recorded for (1),
so the comparison is never verified with a non-zero r6. At runtime a
failed lookup returns NULL, NULL != 1 takes the non-NULL edge and the
program dereferences a pointer that is zero.
Fixes: 2f4cb53eed44 ("bpf: detect non null pointer with register operand in JEQ/JNE.")
Reported-by: Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>
Suggested-by: Nicholas Carlini <npc@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260904083325.2083493-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 303368460ec1..fde5d046b6e3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -17052,6 +17052,15 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, type_may_be_null(dst_reg->type) && ((BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K && insn->imm == 0) || (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && bpf_register_is_null(src_reg)))) { + /* + * For BPF_X the zero is a property of this execution path, + * hence src_reg has to be precise. + */ + if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) { + err = mark_chain_precision(env, insn->src_reg); + if (err) + return err; + } /* Mark all identical registers in each branch as either * safe or unknown depending R == 0 or R != 0 conditional. */ |
